Have started the process with Admin privileges. Using Portable VirtualBox and MojoPac. Chrome Install Without Admin Privilege. Windows Vista. Install Virtualbox Without Admin Privileges In Vista. Install and configure Apex 5. X embedded PL/SQLThis article presents how to install and configure Apex for. New cool list of Windows must have programs. Updated: October 1. In August 2014 all Synology DiskStations where under attack of ransom ware: SynoLocker.

• Install Without Admin Permission

Read the before opening a topic.: Check this before asking questions.: A must read if you want to know what we're talking about. See the Tutorials and FAQ section at the top of the Forum for more guides. Try searching the forums first with Google and add the site filter for this forum. Digging deeper with the dfx pdf free. Install guest additions site:forums.virtualbox.org Retired from this Forum since OSSO introduction.

Volunteer Posts: 17800 Joined: 17. Mar 2008, 13:41 Location: /dev/random Primary OS: Debian other VBox Version: PUEL Guest OSses: Windows XP, Windows 7, Linux.

I want to know that is it possible to create a fully portable virtual machine using any of the VMWare like products? My objective is to create a virtual machine (XP as guest OS), install some app in it, put the vm in a usb2 drive (performance is not a matter), and run it in any windows host os (xp, vista, 7) without installing anything in host, using any host account (admin, guest, limited). Is it possible to do that using any vmware like product? If possible then which one is my best bet? PS: I found a closest match: Qemu; but its lot slower. Doing any real work (coding stuff on.net) in a XP os running on qemu is virtually impossible.

Is there any better one than Qemu or is there anyway I can make Qemu faster? But one restriction, I do not have admin privilege to all the machines, so the solution should be literally portable on any Windows based system. From an answer by the OP Guys, Thanks for your valuable responses. I have been hacking with Qemu a lot, coz it is kind of promising and it conforms to the definition of portability (what I want actually); you need not install anything to the host. I found out a tweak (though all of you may know it) and like to share with you guys. If you use -no-acpi option for Qemu, it is lot faster, not nearly vmware/virtualbox, but that's the performance I can live with. I used the following command for Qemu 'J: Virtualization QEMU qmqemu0-12-3 qemu.exe' -L 'J: Virtualization QEMU qmqemu0-12-3' -M 'pc' -m 512 -cpu 'qemu32' -vga cirrus -serial vc -parallel vc -name 'MinXP' -drive 'file=J: Virtualization QEMU Store MinXP.qcow2,index=0,media=disk' -boot order=dc,menu=on -net nic,vlan=0,macaddr=52-54-00-F3-27-A6,model=rtl8139 -net user,vlan=0 -win2k-hack -no-acpi -hwnd 722498 -localtime With this option it will take long time to install XP, but once up it is faster.

Install Without Admin Permission

No Because virtual machines requires software that simulates and interacts with the host machine, and for networking for example needs to install drivers on the host, a version that will run off a pen drive for example is a long way off still. The biggest limitation is the integration into the hardware layer, and not all machines support vitualization. Therefore software that can run the VM or executable VM's are still not possible. Of course, as long as the software is loaded you can run the VM itself of a pendrive, but you will sometimes find it is a lot slower because of the amount of reading and writing that needs to be done, and I have seen a pendrive or two fail horribly after just short periods of use. To answer your question regarding Qemu.

They have been experimenting with the idea for some time, but the problem still remains with regards to speed, as well as admin privileges because of the drivers. As it was originally developed for Linux, it does work well in Linux environment where hardware drivers can be loaded on the fly, but even then you need the right permissions to be able to do so.